3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Is it better to learn poker strategy manually or with AI ass
Lately I’ve been thinking about whether it still makes sense to learn everything manually when there are so many AI tools available now. Before, I used to read guides and watch videos, but it feels like progress is quite slow that way. Then I found something like , which seems to provide much deeper insights into decision-making. At the same time, I’m a bit worried that relying on AI might make me less independent in my thinking. Do you think combining both methods is the best approach, or should you focus on one?
Posts: 75
Re: Is it better to learn poker strategy manually or with AI
From my experience, combining both methods works best. Traditional learning helps you understand the fundamentals, while AI tools show you how those fundamentals apply in more complex situations. When I started using a solver, I didn’t replace my old study methods, I just added it as another layer. Over time, it helped me see why certain strategies work better than others. If you only rely on AI without understanding the basics, it can get confusing. But when you already have some foundation, it becomes a powerful way to improve faster.
Posts: 77
Re: Is it better to learn poker strategy manually or with AI
I agree with that approach, it makes a lot of sense to build on what you already know instead of replacing it completely. I’ve noticed that when you already have a basic understanding, tools like that start to feel more like confirmation rather than something confusing. They help you connect the dots and see patterns you might miss otherwise. At the same time, if you jump into it without any foundation, it can feel overwhelming because there’s too much information at once. So yeah, using it as an extra layer instead of a replacement seems like the most balanced way to improve.
Posts: 75
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1


