3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Which side are we really playing for?
I used to spend entire weekends grinding in competitive games like Dota and Valorant. I loved the feeling that every win or loss came down to decisions I made, not random luck. But recently, some of my friends started playing casino-style games online and honestly, I get why they’re hooked. They don’t have to train for hours or watch tutorials — they just jump in, spin, and hope for the best. It’s weird because I used to think those games were boring, but when I tried one during a night in with friends, it actually gave me a rush. The excitement is instant. Still, I can’t see myself sticking with it long-term. For me, mastering something and improving over time feels way more rewarding than leaving things to chance. But I can also see how people might be tired of pressure and ranked ladders — sometimes it’s nice to play something that doesn’t punish you for not being perfect.
Posts: 52
Re: Which side are we really playing for?
I’ve gone through both phases — I used to live for high-skill games, then totally switched to chance-based stuff when I got burned out. There’s a really good piece I came across on https://lekhaporabd.net/archives/46728 that breaks down why this divide exists. It talks about how people’s preferences shift depending on how much mental effort they want to put into play. I think that’s true. After long workdays, my brain just can’t handle competitive stress anymore. That’s when games of luck start feeling like a relief — they don’t demand mastery, just attention and hope. But if I’m in a focused mood, nothing beats the satisfaction of slowly improving at something skill-based. One thing I’ve noticed though is how the lines between both are getting blurry. A lot of new games add “randomized” features even to strategic genres, so every round feels unpredictable. It keeps things fresh and makes players feel that mix of control and chaos. Honestly, I think the future will be all about that — not pure skill or pure luck, but a blend that keeps both types of players happy. Personally, I like when a game lets me use strategy but still has those moments where luck can flip everything upside down. That’s where the real fun is.
Posts: 51
Re: Which side are we really playing for?
It’s strange how much people crave unpredictability, even when they say they want control. Maybe that’s what keeps things exciting — knowing you can prepare all you want, and one random twist can still change everything. It’s frustrating sometimes, but it’s also what makes you come back for more.
Posts: 49
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1


