Hey guys, I've been messing around with these GLP-1 stuff for a while now trying to keep the recomp going long-term without just dropping scale weight and looking flat. Last year I ran a pretty standard dual-agonist setup (you know, the GLP-1/GIP one) for about five months straight, dropped a solid chunk of fat but noticed my lifts started feeling heavier sooner than expected even with decent protein and lifting heavy. Now I'm wondering how folks are actually cycling or structuring things when they stack the full triple (adding the glucagon part) compared to sticking with just the dual versions for ongoing body recomposition. Like, do you run the triple harder but shorter bursts to push metabolism, then drop back to dual for maintenance? Or mix/match somehow to avoid tolerance creeping in? Curious what patterns people have found actually sustainable without tanking energy or recovery. Anyone got real-world experience dialing this in?

Man, I've played with both approaches over the past couple years and honestly the triple hits different—feels like it ramps up the energy burn more noticeably, especially when you're in a deficit and trying to hold onto muscle. For me, stacking the full GLP-1/GIP/glucagon agonists in shorter cycles (say 8-12 weeks on higher-ish doses) then easing off to a lower-dose dual-agonist for another 8-10 weeks has kept things moving forward without the usual plateau or that drained feeling. The glucagon kick seems to help partition nutrients better during recomp phases, less fluffy look even when calories creep up a bit. If you're chasing sustained progress, checking out Retatrutide Cost https://morellifit.com/ gave me some solid ideas on how others tweak protocols (not pushing anything, just my two cents from reading around and trial/error). Keeping protein stupid high and lifting consistently makes the biggest difference either way—without that the recomp falls apart quick no matter the compound.